Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • --[[User:Henk69|Henk69]] ([[User talk:Henk69|talk]]) 01:41, 14 December 2012 (MST)
    149 bytes (21 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020
  • --[[User:Henk69|Henk69]] ([[User talk:Henk69|talk]]) 01:35, 14 December 2012 (MST)
    132 bytes (19 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020

Page text matches

  • --[[User:Henk69|Henk69]] ([[User talk:Henk69|talk]]) 01:35, 14 December 2012 (MST)
    132 bytes (19 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020
  • --[[User:Henk69|Henk69]] ([[User talk:Henk69|talk]]) 01:41, 14 December 2012 (MST)
    149 bytes (21 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020
  • Consensus and personal opinions{{opinion|Henk69}}. Discussions can be summarized here, including personal findings{{experience|Henk69}}.
    712 bytes (85 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020
  • Consensus and personal opinions{{opinion|Henk69}}. Discussions can be summarized here, including personal findings{{experience|Henk69}}.
    1 KB (142 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020
  • ...if the mutation itself does not alter the eumelanin color/quality{{opinion|Henk69}}. Update: the mutation in homozygous form appears to dilute black to a mod I have bred the mutation in black and dun animals{{experience|Henk69}}.
    9 KB (1,304 words) - 11:25, 27 March 2020
  • Generally well accepted but personally there is some doubt{{opinion|Henk69}} wether all aspects are valid.
    1 KB (198 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020
  • Incomplete recessive{{opinion|Henk69}}; see also [[#Heterozygosity|Heterozygosity]].
    1 KB (195 words) - 10:46, 27 March 2020